Filed under: Uncategorized
Hawaii Senate Passes Marijuana Decriminalization Measure Unopposed
Posted using ShareThis
Filed under: Uncategorized
[from http://cannabistaxact.org] Note: the text of the OCTA is available in its entirety on the post prior to this – here.
Oregon Cannabis Tax Act – Circulator Training – OCTA 101
Thank you for your interest in being a volunteer circulator for OCTA 2010 (Oregon Cannabis Tax Act 2010). Before you are allowed to begin gathering signatures for our petition, you will need to read the following training materials to ensure quality gathering practices. We are not accepting applications for paid petitioners.
Petition Information:
The petition you will soon be able to download is ONLY a volunteer circulator petition.
Only registered Oregon voters may sign.
Following these instructions carefully will ensure that you meet the state of Oregon’s requirements, so your signatures count. Remember, the OCTA petition is a state document and the copy you make from this web page must be exactly like those approved by the Oregon Secretary of State’s office, or the signatures won’t be valid.
State of Oregon Petition Requirements:
The signature sheet must have the cover sheet with the ballot-title box printed upon the same sheet of paper. The signature sheet must be printed out using only a laser printer or an ink jet printer with waterproof ink, set on the best resolution possible, with 20-pound white bond paper measuring 8-1/2 inches by 11 inches (standard office paper), and black ink only. The signature sheet must be printed on the back of the cover sheet.
You must carry a copy of the text of the petition while gathering signatures.
Any signatures gathered on petition sheets that do not meet the Oregon Secretary of State’s specifications will be disqualified!
To print our petitions you must download the three files below from this site using Acrobat software. The petition will load automatically in Acrobat when you click to download the files below. If you can’t download or print these files, please call our office at (503) 235-4606 to have us send you petition forms via the U.S. Postal Service.
This is a 10 Signature Oregon Petition that consists of three files. Once again, the Cover Sheet (03-cover-sheet-template.pdf) must be printed on the back of the Signature Sheet (02-signature-sheet-template.pdf). These two files must be printed on a single double-sided sheet of paper and you must have a copy of the text with you when petitioning.
Available now: Download the text of OCTA 2010
http://cannabistaxact.org/downloads/01-octa2010text-circulator-information.pdf
Available soon: Download the Petition’s Signature Sheet
http://www.cannabistaxact.org/downloads/02-signature-sheet-template.pdf for the front of the Petition.
Available soon: Download Cover Sheet
http://www.cannabistaxact.org/downloads/03-cover-sheet-template.pdf for the back of the Petition.
Please mail your petition(s) back to us as soon as possible. We will turn in our signatures as early as we can. There are 10 signature lines on the petitions, but you do not have to fill the entire sheet unless you so desire.
Mail petitions to:Oregon Cannabis Tax Act Headquarters
5220 North East Sandy Blvd.
Portland, Oregon 97213
Last Updated: February 25, 2010
Instructions for Signers
• Only active registered voters of the state of Oregon may sign a petition. Sign your full name, as you did when you registered to vote.
• Please fill in the date on which you signed the petition, your printed name and your residence address in the spaces provided.
• Initial any changes that you or the circulator makes to your printed name, residence address or date on which you signed the petition.
• It is advisable to use a pen for signing petitions.
• It is unlawful to sign any person’s name other than your own. Do not sign another person’s name under any circumstances.
• It is unlawful to sign a petition more than once.
• It is unlawful for a person to knowingly sign a petition when the person is not qualified to sign it.
Instructions for Circulators
• Only active registered voters of the state of Oregon may sign a petition.
• It is advisable to have signers use a pen for signing petitions or for certifying petitions.
• Only one circulator may collect signatures on any one sheet of a petition.
• Each circulator must personally witness all signatures the circulator collects.
• Circulators shall not cause to be circulated a petition knowing it to contain a false signature.
• Circulators shall not knowingly make any false statement to any person who signs it or requests informa-tion about it.
• Circulators shall not attempt to obtain the signature of a person knowing that the person is not qualified to sign it.
• Circulators shall not offer money or anything of value to another person to sign or not sign a petition.
• Circulators shall not sell or offer to sell signature sheets.
• Circulators shall not write, alter, correct, clarify or obscure any information about the signers unless the signer is disabled and request assistance or the signer initials after the changes are made.
• Circulators shall not accept compensation to circulate a petition that is based on the number of signatures obtained.
Warning! Violations of the circulator requirements may result in conviction of a felony with a fine of up to $125,000 and/or prison for up to 5 years.
[The above information is from: http://cannabistaxact.org/downloads/01-octa2010text-circulator-information.pdf]
Filed under: activism, Education, Legality, Uncategorized | Tags: activism, anti-prohibition, delivery, dispensory, hemp, initiative, legal, norml, OCCC, oregon, ORNORML, regulate, tax, vote
[from http://cannabistaxact.org/downloads/01-octa2010text-circulator-information.pdf ]
The Oregon Cannabis Tax Act
Whereas the people of the State of Oregon find that Cannabis hemp is an environmentally beneficial crop that:
(a) Yields several times more fiber, for paper and textiles, than any other plant;
(b) Yields cloth and paper of superior strength and durability without the application of pesticides during cultivation and without producing cancer-causing pollutants during processing;
(c) Yields more seed oil and protein, for prodigious and ecological biodiesel fuel, plastics and nutritious food, than any other plant;
(d) Yields more biomass than any other plant outside the tropics, though it grows well in the tropics too, and grows faster than any other plant on earth in the temperate and cooler climates;
(e) Yields a substance that relieves the suffering of many ill people without life-threatening side effects; and,
Whereas the people find that federal and corporate misinformation campaigns that economically benefit small groups of people have suppressed the information above and the fact that:
(a) George Washington grew cannabis for more than 30 years and, while he was President, said, “the artificial preparation of hemp is really a curiosity” and told his Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, that he was, “suggesting the policy of encouraging the growth of Hemp”;
(b) Thomas Jefferson invented a device to process cannabis, and cannabis fiber was used for most clothing and paper production until the invention of the cotton gin;
(c) Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania, who spoke at the U.S. Constitutional Convention in 1787 more than any other delegate and of whom James Madison said, “the style and finish of the Constitution properly belongs to the pen of Gouverneur Morris,” wrote a paper he sent to Thomas Jefferson called, “Notes Respecting Tobacco” that compared cannabis and tobacco and concluded that cannabis “is to be preferred”; and,
Whereas the people find that cannabis is Oregon’s largest cash crop, indicating that cannabis prohibition has failed;
and
Whereas the people find that, despite misinformation concocted to justify cannabis prohibition, the courts of Alaska, Hawaii and Michigan have noted presidential commission findings, scientific studies, and learned treatises which:
(a) Characterize cannabis as a relatively nonaddictive and comparatively harmless euphoriant used and cultivated for more than 10,000 years without a single lethal overdose;
(b) Demonstrate that moderate cannabis intoxication causes very little impairment of psychomotor functions; reveal no significant physical, biochemical, or mental abnormalities attributable solely to cannabis use; and that long-term, heavy cannabis users do not deviate significantly from their social peers in terms of mental function;
(c) Disprove the “stepping stone” or “gateway drug” argument that cannabis use leads to other drugs; rather, that lies taught about cannabis, once discovered, destroy the credibility of valid educational messages about moderate and responsible use and valid warnings against other truly dangerous drugs;
(d) Indicate that cannabis users are less likely to commit violent acts than alcohol users, refute the argument that
cannabis causes criminal behavior, and suggest that most users avoid aggressive behavior, even in the face of provocation; and
(e) Declare that cannabis use does not constitute a public health problem of any significant dimension; finds no rational basis for treating cannabis as more dangerous than alcohol; and
Whereas the people of the State of Oregon find that cannabis does not cause the social ills that its prohibition was intended to guard against; rather, that most of the social ills attributed to cannabis result from its unreasonable prohibition which:
(a) Provides incentives to traffic in marijuana instead of limiting its prevalence, since almost all cannabis users evade the prohibition, even though drastically expanding public safety budgets have reduced funding for other vital services such as education;
(b) Fosters a black market that exploits children, provides an economic subsidy for gangs, and sells cannabis of questionable purity and uncertain potency;
(c) Generates enormous, untaxed, illicit profits that debase our economy and corrupt our justice system; and,
(d) Wastes police resources, clogs our courts, and drains the public budget to no good effect; and,
Whereas, the people recall that alcohol prohibition had caused many of the same social ills before being replaced by regulatory laws which, ever since, have granted alcohol users the privilege of buying alcohol from state licensees, imposed strict penalties protecting children, delivered alcohol of sure potency, and generated substantial public revenues;
and,
Whereas the people hold that cannabis prohibition is a sumptuary law of a nature repugnant to our constitution’s framers and which is so unreasonable and liberticidal as to:
(a) Arbitrarily violate the rights of cannabis users to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure as guaranteed to them by Article 1, Section 9 of the Oregon
Constitution;
(b) Unreasonably impose felony burdens on the cannabis users while the state grants special privileges to alcohol users, which violates Article 1, Section 20 of the Oregon Constitution;
(c) Unnecessarily proscribe consumption of an “herb bearing seed” given to humanity in Genesis 1:29, thereby violating their unqualified religious rights under Article 1, Section 3 and their Natural Rights under Article 1, Section 33 of the Oregon Constitution;
(d) Violates the individual’s right to privacy and numerous other Natural and Constitutional Rights reserved to the people under Article 1, Section 33 of the Oregon Constitution;
(e) Violates the state’s right to regulate and tax an intoxicant market as reserved to states under the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, thereby abdicating control to illicit markets; and,
(f) Irrationally subvert the ends to which, in its Preamble, the Oregon Constitution was ordained and the purposes, in Article 1, Section 1, for which our government was instituted; now,
Therefore, the people find that the constitutional ends of justice, order, and the perpetuation of liberty; the governmental purposes of preserving the peace, safety, and happiness of the people; and the vitality of the other constitutional provisions cited above, demand the replacement of a costly, self-defeating prohibition with regulatory laws controlling cannabis cultivation, potency, sale, and use; defining and prohibiting cannabis abuse; protecting children with a comprehensive drug education program and strict penalties for the sale or provision of cannabis to minors; funding state drug abuse treatment programs; promoting Oregon hemp for fuel, fiber and food; and raising substantial revenue for public use.
Wherefore, be it enacted by the people of the state of Oregon, the laws relating to cannabis are revised as follows: Section 1. This Act shall operate uniformly throughout Oregon and fully replace and supersede all statutes, municipal charter enactments, and local ordinances relating to cannabis, except those relating to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act. A new state commission is hereby created and shall be called the Oregon Cannabis Control Commission, or the OCCC. The OCCC shall regulate the sale of cannabis and cultivation of cannabis for sale. The OCCC shall consist of seven members, with a minimum of five members chosen for their expertise in the cultivation of cannabis and assuring the quality of the resulting products. This Act is a scientific experiment by the people of the state of Oregon to lower the misuse of, illicit traffic in and harm associated with cannabis and will set up voluntary studies of cannabis users under ORS 474.045 (b) and other studies.
Section 2. Section 3 of this Act creates an ORS chapter 474 titled the “Oregon Cannabis Tax Act.” Legislative Counsel shall move and renumber existing provisions of chapter 474.
Section 3. 474.005 Definitions. As used in this chapter:
(1) “Abuse” means repetitive or excessive drug use such that the individual fails to fulfill a statutory or common law duty, including but not limited to the duties owed by parents to children, by motorists to pedestrians and other motorists, and by employees to employers, fellow employees, and the public.
(2) “Cannabis” means the flowering tops and all parts, derivatives, or preparations of the cannabis plant, also known as “marijuana,” containing cannabinoids in concentrations established by the commission to be psychoactive, but does not include “hemp” as defined by ORS 474.005(5).
(3) “Commission” means the the Oregon Cannabis Control Commission, or OCCC.
(4) “Cultivation” means growing the cannabis plant.
(5) “Hemp” means the seeds, stems, and stalks of the cannabis plant, and all other parts, products, and byproducts of the cannabis plant not containing cannabinoids in concentrations established by the commission to be psychoactive. Seeds and starts of all cannabis strains shall be considered hemp.
(6) “Person” means a natural individual or corporate entity of any kind whatsoever.
474.015 Short Title. This chapter may be cited as the “Oregon Cannabis Tax Act.”
474.025 Purpose of the Oregon Cannabis Tax Act. This chapter shall be liberally construed so as to minimize the misuse and abuse of cannabis; to prevent the illicit sale or provision of cannabis to minors; and to protect the peace, safety, and happiness of Oregonians while preserving the largest measure of liberty consistent with the above purposes.
474.035 Powers and duties of the commission, licenses for cultivation and processing. Hemp fiber, protein, oil not regulated.
(1) The commission shall have the powers necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter. It shall make such rules and regulations as will discourage and minimize the diversion of cannabis to illicit sale or use within the state, the illicit importation and sale of cannabis cultivated or processed outside the state, and the illicit export or removal of cannabis from the state. The commissions jurisdiction shall extend to any person licensed under this chapter to cultivate or process cannabis, but shall not extend to any person who manufactures products from hemp. Hemp production for fiber, protein and oil shall be allowed without regulation, license or fee. No federal license shall be required to cultivate hemp in Oregon.
(2)The commission shall issue to any qualified applicant a license to cultivate hemp that produce better quality and quantity of fiber, protein and oil, shall establish reasonable concentrations of cannabinols deemed psychoactive under this chapter.
474.095 Commission to set standards, test purity, grade potency of cannabis, label contents.
(1) The commission, in consultation with the State Board of Pharmacy, shall set standards which the commission
shall apply:
(a) To test and reject cannabis containing adulterants in concentrations known to harm people; and,
(b) To grade cannabis potency by measuring the concentrations of psychoactive cannabinoids it contains.
(2) The commission shall affix to cannabis packages a label which shall bear the state seal, a certification of purity, a grade of potency, the date of harvest, a warning as to the potential for abuse, and notice of laws prohibiting resale, removal from the state, public consumption, and provision and sale to minors.
474.105 Commission may limit purchases. The commission may limit the quantity of cannabis purchased by a person at one time or over any length of time and may refuse to sell cannabis to any person who violates this chapter’s provisions or abuses cannabis within the meaning of ORS 474.005(1).
474.115 Unlicensed cultivation for sale, removal from the state, penalties. Cultivation for sale, removal from the state for sale, and sale of cannabis, without commission authority, shall be Class C felonies, and removal from the state of cannabis for other than sale shall be a Class A misdemeanor.
474.125 Sale or provision to minors, penalties, exception. The sale of cannabis to minors shall be a Class B felony, and gratuitous provision of cannabis to minors shall be a Class A misdemeanor, except when to a minor over 18 years of age under the same conditions provided by ORS 471.030(1) for alcohol.
474.135 Fine as additional penalty. In addition to other penalties and in lieu of any civil remedy, conviction of sale or unlicensed cultivation for sale under ORS 474.115 or 474.125 shall be punishable by a fine which the court shall determine will deprive an offender of any profits from the criminal activity.
474.145 Acquisition by minors, penalty. Except as provided by ORS 474.125, the purchase, attempt to purchase, possession, or acquisition of cannabis by a person under 21 years of age shall be a violation punishable by a fine of not more than $250.
474.155 Public consumption prohibited, penalty, exception. Except where prominent signs permit and minors are neither admitted nor employed, public consumption of cannabis shall be a violation punishable by a fine of not more than $250.
474.205 Commission to study methods of use, potential for abuse, establish cannabis levels for presumption of intoxication. The commission, in consultation with the Board of Pharmacy and by grants to accredited research facilities, shall:
(a) Study methods of use and the potential for, and ill effects of, abuse of cannabis, the possible damage of throat and lungs from inhaling cannabis smoke, less harmful methods of administration, including but not limited to filtration of smoke and non-combustive vaporization of the psychoactive agents in cannabis, and shall report its findings in pamphlets distributed at OCCC stores; and,
(b) Study cannabis intoxication and, if practicable, shall establish by rule levels of impairment above which a person shall be presumed intoxicated.
474.215 Presumption of negligence. In civil cases, a rebuttable presumption of negligence shall arise upon clear and convincing evidence that a person is found to be intoxicated at the time of an accident and if the person’s actions materially contributed to the cause of injury.
474.305 Disclosure of names and addresses prohibited. Information on applicants, licensees, and purchasers under this chapter shall not be disclosed except upon the person’s request.
474.315 Attorney General’s duties. The Attorney General shall vigorously defend this Act and any person prosecuted for acts licensed under this chapter, propose a federal and/or international act to remove impediments to this chapter, deliver the proposed federal and/or international act to each member of Congress and/or international organization, and urge adoption of the proposed federal and/or international act through all legal and appropriate means.
(3)474.325 Effect. This Act shall take effect on January 1, 2011. Any section of this Act being held invalid as to any person or circumstance shall not affect the application of any other section of this Act that can be given full or partial effect without the invalid section or application. If any law or entity of any type whatsoever is held to impede this chapter’s full effect, unimpeded provisions shall remain in effect and the impeded provisions shall regain effect upon the impediments removal.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: legalization cannabis majuana california CAAB390
Assembly committee OKs bill to legalize marijuana
January 12, 2010 | 10:52 am
A proposal to legalize and tax marijuana in California was approved by a key committee of the Assembly this morning, over the dire warnings of police chiefs and prosecutors.
The Public Safety Committee voted 4-3 to approve AB 390 by Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco), who said the bill would provide tax revenue to the state and regulation of the drug. The new law includes a requirement that users be at least 21 years old.
The measure next goes to the Health Committee, but proponents worried it would not be acted on by that panel by Friday’s deadline, which would require the proposal to be reintroduced to be heard this year by the full Assembly.
“The way it exists now is harming our youth,” Ammiano said. “Drug dealers do not ask for ID. We need to regulate something that has gone chaotic, has resulted in carnage. I understand it’s not everybody’s cup of tea.”
Assemblyman Danny Gilmore (R-Hanford), a former CHP commander, said the $50 tax on each ounce of marijuana sold to pay for drug education and treatment is not worth the grief that will be caused by legalization.
“We’re going to legalize marijuana, we’re going to tax it and then we’re going to educate our kids about the harm of drugs. You’ve got to be kidding me,” Gilmore said. “What’s next? Are we going to legalize methamphetamines, cocaine?”
The measure was opposed in testimony today by several police chiefs and law enforcement officials including Bob Cooke, former president of the California Narcotics Officers Assn., who predicted it would lead to an increase in crime. “The mere consideration of an attempt to trade human misery for tax dollars smacks of the cynical throwing away of countless human beings,” Cooke told the committee.
It is estimated that the bill would generate $1.3 billion a year in taxes and marijuana cultivation fees.
–Patrick McGreevy in Sacramento
From: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/01/assembly-committee-oks-bill-to-legalize-marijuana.html
Filed under: Legality, Uncategorized | Tags: cafe, cannabis, initiatives, marijuana, medical, norml, oregon, reform

On the heals of opening the first cafe of it’s kind, Oregon NORML has succeeded in getting two initiatives through The House to regulate and tax cannabis. Polls are being taken to determine which initiative out of two will be put forth for signatures and ultimately the people’s vote.
When passed (yes, when) the Oregon Cannabis Control Commission -OCCC will be established with a mandate for at least one NORML member on the board.
One of the initiatives includes modification of new hemp cultivation restrictions, specifically to allow growth of higher seed yielding strains that can potentially free us of our dependence on foreign oil.
You may ask, what’s unique about this cafe? Medicine is dispensed freely with no exchange of money through Budtenders at the bar, glycerine tinctures, buds, hash. Everything in stock is available for the asking. Perhaps most remarkable is that all cannabis and cannabis products are donated. While I was there a bell was rang periodically followed by cheers and applause. It turns out that the bell is a signal that another donation of medicine has been made! The cafe boasts an abundance of medicine and very generous supporters. What’s more is all of the people involved in the operation are volunteer. Here we have a Cannabis Cafe operating solely on donations and volunteers.
Why free dispensing? The. Oregon Medical Marijuana Patient (OMMP) program prohibits sale and trade of cannabis. And growers, also called providers are in short supply, leaving many OMMP cardholders without medicine. Or forcing them to the expensive and dangerous black market to obtain medicine.
There are of course expenses that cannot be covered by volunteer hours, such as rent, utilities, insurance, etc. To keep the cafe open and these groundbreaking services available there are mambership fees that can be paid in $20 a month payments and a door fee of $5 per entry. With black market cannabis going for over $400 an ounce these fees make medicine more affordable. There are breaks in fees for volunteers based on the nature of the individual’s services provided to the cafe. No breaks or compensation however for the donation of medical cannabis products, as this would violate Oregon laws.
Filed under: Delivery methods | Tags: contest, dopecast, iinhale, iolite, vaporizer
I won an Iolite (formerly iInhale) by listening to the Dopecast at http://dopefiend.co.uk
I’ve blogged about this little beauty in a previous post here http://cannabisactivism.wordpress.com/2008/11/22/newflameless-portable-vaporizor/
The manufacturer has changed the name to Iolite but it is the same ingenious, easy to use pocket vaporizer.
For a chance to win your very own Iolite Vaporizor, in the next few weeks, tune into the Dopecast every Monday to hear the contest question and send in your answer. Those who’ve sent the correct answer will be included in a drawing held on the following Monday’s show. This is a limited time contest so don’t waste any time.
Good luck!
Filed under: activism, Education, Legality, marijuana Conversations | Tags: americans with safe acess, asa, california, economist, norml
Have you noticed it? The media has picked it up and is running with it. More truths are being brought forward and propaganda exposed. For example, a recent issue of the Economist devoted to the ineffectiveness and costs of the war on drugs, prime time television episodes exploring the topic of medical marijuana and legalization.
Did Obama’s open forum inform the media AND politicians that this is a topic that needs discussion. That the citizens want to review the truth about these issues? I think so. I believe that it was the tipping point.
While pro cannabis movements take steps backward around the world, such as the re-criminalization in the UK, other countries push boundaries. In the United States a California representative has presented a bill to tax the sale of Marijuana for adults ages 21 and over. It just makes sense that a bankrupt state capitalize and benefit from it’s largest industry. A Federal bill has been proposed to allow possession of several grams of Marijuana.
Times are a-changing. Are you helping to steer these changes? Get involved, and stay informed. Contact Americans for Safe Access and Norml to learn how.
Interviews and coverage of HEMPFEST 2008 PDX
While attending the 2008 Hempfest in Portland Oregon I asked, “Who benefits from this war on drugs?” The answers were recorded along with other conversations and interviews that I conducted while there.
The link in this post takes you to those interveiws compile with an introduction to Dopefiend, host of Dopecast, the worlds favourite cannabis podcast (ink in blogroll)
Filed under: Delivery methods, Education | Tags: butane, delivery, handheld, technology, vaporizer
The iinhale is a butane powered, portable pocket vaporizer. It was throughly road tested for an entire week, you can here the report recorded live during the testing here.
I’ve been listening to the chap that hosts that show for more than a year now. After hearing his review I purchased one and can say that it is all that it seems to be.
Easy to operate. Very efficient. Quite a stealth machine. Perhaps the best part is the convenience. I leave it loaded. And in the middle of the night, when I need it most my medicine is handy and can be administered without getting up to fuss with lighters, grinders, cords, plugs, pipes, bowls. And not much of a wait to hit it either.
It reaches functional temperatures in under a minute. Holding 120 minutes worth of butane this device fits in the palm of your hand. Similar in size to a cell phone. There is little to no aroma created as you’re not burning anything. And the cost is comparable to other vaporizers that require additional parts, electricity and more.
I own a lovely portable vaporizor that is powered by a bic lighter. It takes a bit of practice to get the temps right and the lighters do get very hot. I’ve burned myself several times. Also it requires little or no wind when using outdoors. And at our cardholders meetings sharing it is a better idea than practice as it takes a bit of practice to use properly without burning the cannabis and soiling the device with the black tar.
This iinhale device is wonderfully easy to use and share with other cardholders. You simply turn it one, press the piazo (sp?) switch, let it heat up for about 45 seconds and draw delicious flavor through the tube.
The herb chamber holds quite a bit of herb. It is so efficient that I’m hardly putting a dent in my supply.
I highly recommend this vaporizer. Mark my words, it is the next generation of cannabis consumption. These will become as popular as bic lighters.
